The Social Media-savvy Side of a Campaign to Protect Marriage 

by Matthew Stringer


As a recent Californian transplant to Washington state, I had the opportunity to briefly involve myself in the campaign to define marriage as hetero-only when I was living down there in Los Angeles.  A large contingent of young voters have taken to the issue on both sides.  Prop 8, as it’s called, would insert wording into the California constitution that would legally define marriage as being only between a man and a woman.  About 8 years ago a state referendum was passed declaring the same as state law, but the state courts later determined that it didn’t measure up to constitutional standards.  So, the only way around this has become to change the state constitution completely – the checks and balances of democracy at work.  And the campaigns on both sides are hard at work.

What impresses me is the extent of web-savvy we’re seeing on the ‘yes’ side.  The ‘yes on 8′ folks, which most would argue fit traditionally into the conservative sphere, are using methods many have been observing working effectively for liberal campaigns, including the presidential run of Barack Obama, to energize their voting base and promote their message.  These methods include an aggressive reach into social media.  Facebook groups, blogs, and web videos are being implemented to spread the word and educate potential California voters, especially young ones who are generally tapped in to these on-line communities.  More interesting, though, is the obvious desire of the yes campaign to concede transparency in the process.  Above you have a video that not only depicts the campaign and its message, but openly shows some of the means, including the building of a website whatisprop8.com that they have utilized to continue the campaign. As Clay Shirky would point out, the web is providing for collective action through sharing and collaboration. Sharing the process openly, being transparent, helps others interested in that process to share and engage in the campaign, too. Instead of trying to control the message through traditional media (TV ads, print, etc), the message is set free and empowers social media users to negotiate it on their own terms. Considering the early TV campaigning going on in California by some ‘no on 8′ advocates during the Summer Olympics in August, it’s almost a wonder to see the liberal camp taking a conservative approach in the early going while the conservative side, who you think would be doing things the old fashioned way, was watching facebook groups and profiles cropping up through both their own efforts and spontaneously. Kudos to Kenny McNett, featured in the video and a close personal friend, for his social media efforts, as well as the rest of the plugged-in crowd in LA and Santa Monica.

It’s also no secret that these social media-savvy ‘yes on 8′ advocates down there in the southland are mostly Mormons (as am I) and that the church, which runs the site this video is hosted at, is heavily advocating ‘yes on 8′.  That added level of transparency from these religious people not only forwards the campaign’s image as approachable and open, but it starkly differentiates itself from ‘no on 8′ supporters, which do not have the same kind of support from religious groups that the ‘yes’ contingent holds.  This isn’t to say grassroots efforts from the ‘no’ side on-line aren’t in place; that goes without question – it’s just that the conservative side is embracing what one might think they typically wouldn’t, even if it is late in the technological game.  Perhaps this all might change a mind or two when it comes to the widely held image that Latter-day Saints, or conservative religious people in general, are a little backwards for the digital times.  At least the young Mormons I know are engaging in new media and making sure that their voice is heard.  And thus we see that some religious people, like the Mormons, do look at the intarwebs as SERIOUS BUSINESS, too.

 
Share/Bookmark

You might also enjoy...

Tags: , , ,

  • Well, I guess I should clarify my thought: if a Utahn had registered it then having WHOIS point you to Utah is a given without private registration ...unless... we all know that a hosting provider could be located in any state, even Utah, so the argument that it's a Utah thing is totally unprovable. But, that would just make it peculiar that they chose Utah to host and have private registration in Utah. Either way, I hear ya, Pete.
  • That's interesting... private WHOIS registration is very common these days, so I am surprised whatisprop8.com would have Utah registration. That's really odd.
  • Mattso, I realize the importance of base motivation in politics, but don't you think that taking this online is just expanding the echo chamber? The brilliant political theorist and constitutional scholar Cass Sunstein had a great article in The New Republic recently about the subject of blogs' and webboards' role in creating hyperpolarized opinions; aren't these videos and Facebook groups just an example of this?

    Also, it's kinda pitiful that nobody thought to register whatisprop8.com using an address in California, to at least put a fig leaf on it being a wholly LDS-financed operation. A WHOIS search shows it registered to an address in Orem with an 801 phone number. That kind of laziness shows serious contempt for the process.
  • Thanks for your comment, Pete. I'm not an expert, but perhaps persuasion might not be the intent of having those videos out there all the time. Sometimes when you're campaigning you simply need to get your message out to remind your base about the election itself - because they already know how that base is going to vote anyways. What's the voting percentage of the population in general anyway? Sheesh, whatever it is, seems nobody votes! But, really, what do I know? I'm not a political scientist.
  • Here's another thing: these YouTube videos aren't gonna persuade anyone who isn't an alumnus of Brigham Young University. They are, quite frankly, bullshit.
  • Matthew,

    Thanks for dropping by my place. I've replied over there, so what follows may not be new ...

    What I'm calling 'spam' are the numerous comments and blogs made by Mormons that suggest no effort on the part of the authors beyond simply copying-and-pasting church-provided material.

    If you feel evidence is lacking, I'd point you to the hundreds of Mormon blogs that list six dire consequences if Prop 8 is defeated. Not five, not seven, never more, never less, but always the same six.

    Or, I could point you to the slew of comments made by Mormons online since the October 8th satellite transmission from LDS HQ that parrot the terminology and arguments made by the Mormon leadership during that broadcast.

    I mention whatisprop8.com because whenever I see a blog or comment that includes a link or reference to that site, it's a dead giveaway that the author is Mormon. As online campaign strategies go, telling your members to always include a reference to the same Mormon-authored website is kinda boneheaded. It reinforces the perception among non-Mormon readers that the Mormon church has basically taken over the Prop 8 campaign. Of course, you have, in fact, taken over the Prop 8 campaign, but I just don't understand why you'd adopt a tactic that makes your dominance of the campaign even more obvious.
  • Chino,

    (My comment here is lifted verbatim from the comment I left on your blog, FYI). Thank you for leaving a comment on my blog. I would like to respond to your "mormon spammers" remark. I'm not so certain you can logically equate individuals leaving original comments on websites, forums, or blogs, to actual spamming. Spamming is a complicated, and I'm certain, illegal process requiring software, bots, or special scripts, with many negative ramifications for the Internet in general.

    If whatisprop8.com wishes to inform people who are supportive of prop 8 on how to get out their message to other blogs and blog users, to, essentially, engage in the conversation that is going on in all this social media space, then that's perfectly acceptable social behavior.

    Nevertheless, thank you for your comment. I am intelligent enough to grasp that your 'spamming' metaphor comes from a place of resentment towards the LDS Church's and individual Latter-day Saints' desire to promote prop 8. But, it's just not spamming. Plain and simple. For your metaphor to even work, you'd have to assume that any Mormon who reads whatisprop8 is going to automagically turnaround and start blasting comments all over the web. That's just not true. You and I both know people do whatever the heck they wish.

    Anyway, thanks again. I'd love to hear back from you.
  • I'm getting tired of seeing these Mormon spambots everywhere.

    Anytime you see www.whatisprop8.com, you know it's coming from a member of the LDS church.

    Head over and check out “How to Blog About Prop 8″ at http://www.whatisprop8.com/how-to-blog-about-prop-8.html

    It’s basically a primer for Mormons on how to become Latter Day Spammers.

    A quick check of the comments sections under the news articles that turn up from a search for Prop 8 terms reveals numerous drive-by comments with convoluted "Yes on 8 = tolerance" arguments and always accompanied by a link to www.whatisprop8.com ...

    This approach reminds me of some of the stuff I saw getting tried during the Romney campaign. In the current campaign, I don’t think such tactics are well-suited for the target voters the Yes on 8 campaign needs if they’re going to actually win this thing. Californians who’d be persuaded by such obvious tactics are more than likely either not going to vote or are already planning to vote Yes.
  • Thanks, Kenny!
  • thanks for the shout out, mattso! long live new media
  • Well, I did in fact mention that I helped the campaign while in LA, so, yeah, I think my stance is obvious. But thank you for the wonderful comments!
  • aims
    I will peruse the website. And yes, I do recognize that you weren't making a political statement, taking a stance, or focusing on either side of the issues via your post.

    I respect people who take a stand for what they believe in, and I agree that it's really cool how your friends incorporated various methods to get the word out.

    I was more saying that I tend to have strong feelings about certain things without first studying out both sides of the picture, which often makes me look like an ignorant and ill-informed jerk.
  • Make sure you check out whatisprop8.com. I would like to point out, too, that this post wasn't so much about the pros or cons of prop 8 and/or gay marriage, but about the digital media side of the campaigning. I am impressed with what my friends and associates in LA on the Yes team are coming up with to engage people on-line it doesn't actually matter what they are campaigning about, it's that they are effectively using new social media tools to do it.

    I would love to chat with you about the actual topic of gay marriage some other time, but I don't think it's something I'd be writing about in this blog. Never know, though.
  • aims
    I would like to chat with you about this sometime. I think we have different opinions, but I'm interested to learn more about the issues and where people in the 'yes' camp are coming from before I get all huffy about it. :)
blog comments powered by Disqus
Facebook Chatter

Bad Behavior has blocked 697 access attempts in the last 7 days.