Posts Tagged ‘kathy gill’

Post-class Reflection: Economics 101, courtesy of Monday Night Football, Chris Anderson, and Mickey Mouse

Friday, October 30th, 2009

Epic MickeyI’ll explain what this image is about momentarily, but first, let me begin with a prologue.  Tuesday night in my Net Economics course at the UW MCDM a lively debate, to say the least, was had over Chris Anderson’s new book “Free”; whether free as a concept was good or bad.  I took the free side, but it made me feel a little lonely.  I almost felt like I was the only student in the room who believed that it’s a good thing that we’re moving towards a digital economy based on giving bits away, harnessing business models that find alternative sources of revenue.  For instance, a fellow student mentioned that Microsoft has a 90% market share of netbook operating systems, a testament to the strength of their software, no doubt.  However, I posited that if MSFT went the Anderson route and gave their OS away for free they could have a 100% market share.  I’m not going to say what the reaction to that was, but considering our proximity to Redmond and the makeup of the class, which includes Microsoft employees, you can take a wild guess…

Anderson’s “Free” starts out by giving us a quick economics briefing, using that as backdrop to defend the notion of ‘free’.  He explains that, for instance, traditional, or old media has used a third-party advertising model to earn revenue while still providing a “free” product.  I may not pay for 30 Rock, but when I buy products advertised during commercial breaks on TV or in interstitials on Hulu, I am still giving my money to NBC.  It’s pretty basic and has worked for Google, a benevolent empire that has largely amassed their wealth through selling advertising and diversifying revenue streams.  Of course, the model isn’t absolutely identical – the web magnifies things by presenting opportunities to apply wisdom gleaned from specific metrics and target users with relevant advertising, as well as ways of satisfying niches with long tail services – but the principle is the same: subsidize one product (free content) with money made from another (paid ad space).  Multiply and diversify.

With the notion of one product funding the other in mind, I further illustrate the point by explaining how I helped inadvertently save ABC, Monday Night Football, and the Disney company in 2004.  Maybe.  Or not.  But keep reading!  I think you’ll enjoy the reasoning anyways!

(more…)

Learning goals for Net Economics

Friday, October 9th, 2009

This quarter in the MCDM at the University of Washington (my final quarter, w00t!), I am taking a course entitled “Economics of Digital Communication”.  During introductions in the class I rightly indicated that I am only in the class because it is one of the two being offered this quarter that I had not yet taken.  I don’t know anything about economics, and I am not certain it’s a field that is of any interest to me.  However, after one night of class and doing some reading for my other course, also related to economics, I am beginning to feel much more interest.  I am realizing that economics is actually a realm expressly critical to everything we do, because there is a dollar sign attached to everything in the universe, or so it seems.

This isn’t at all to say I know absolutely nothing about technology and business, if not specifically economics.  I know plenty about innovation, incumbents, disruptors, and so forth.  But, now I need to learn about the Information Economy. And, gladly, our instructor has been going over the basics of economics already, so I feel I won’t be utterly lost in this course.

(more…)

Lawrence Lessig and the Colbert Remix

Friday, January 30th, 2009

Yes, this is a little late in coming, but I wanted to blog about it for my friends and colleagues in the MCDM community anyways.  It seemed especially fitting to send this out to the gang because not only does the subject cover a multitude of issues we’ve discussed and continue to study relative to the Digital Media program, but it’s got Stephen Colbert, too.  And as far as I’m concerned, anything with Stephen Colbert is required viewing.

So, a couple of weeks ago Lawrence Lessig from Stanford appeared on The Colbert Report to discuss how copyright law is complicating things for everybody in the digital era, especially for kids, who are, unfortunately, being turned into criminals by institutions like the RIAA.  Here’s the interview:

Of course, near the end Colbert pretty much invites the world to take his material, even this interview, and “remix” it however they want.  Three cheers for encouraging the Colbert Nation to steal Viacom’s intellectual property!  And, of course, it was only a matter of time before the Interwebs would be all over this challenge.

(more…)


Bad Behavior has blocked 669 access attempts in the last 7 days.