Posts Tagged ‘copyright’

“Meme” is the least understood word on the Internet

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

RickRollToday’s unusual disappearance of the original “RickRoll” video file uploaded to YouTube (which has amassed over 30 million views and was forever prominently featured on Rick Astley’s YouTube channel), has led popular übergeek Chris Pirillo to declare the Internet meme of RickRolling “dead” (update: ok, it looks like he understands the word ‘meme’ a bit more than I gave him credit for).

As much as I admire Chris, I’m not so sure he loads of other people don’t understand the meaning of the word “meme“.  A meme is an idea spread from person to person, not a single item or piece of so-called intellectual property.  Physical artifacts, or, in this case, Internet content items, can be used to spread ideas, but the ideas themselves exist only in the minds of those people exposed to them.  Simply removing one digital iteration, one copy, of a content item used to proliferate an idea does not effectively kill said idea, no matter how popular the content item might have been.  (Besides, the RickRoll video itself is so widespread that boundless digital copies and variations exist in numerous forms.)  Rickrolling is an idea, not intellectual property, and it therefore can never be subject to copyright, and it can never “die”.

(more…)

Content laundering: Technotise, Green Lantern, and user-generated marketing

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

I’m a regular reader of Nikki Finke’s Deadline Hollywood Daily.  I think her blog is a pretty decent way of keeping tabs on all things business of Hollywood.  Sure, she has some detractors, and “TOLDJA” (which she is trying to trademark) gets pretty annoying, but she tends to have really great items on a daily basis.

So, this little item from yesterday about how she’s been getting bombarded by folks with links to YouTube user Jaron Pitts‘s superbly fan-made Green Lantern and Technotise movie trailers caught my eye for a particularly noteworthy reason, in terms of copyright and infringement issues.  Before I dive in to that, though, first, the Technotise trailer he cut so you know what I’m talking about:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPu-PRHtCWE

Basically, Pitts has assembled a trailer almost entirely out of infringing content from all kinds of sources (just as he did for the Green Lantern fake).  Sure, he’s doing it as a fan and we could get in to issues of participatory culture and the work of Henry Jenkins and why this isn’t necessarily a bad thing (and we all know I’d be a hypocrite to call him out for it myself… ahem) but what is REALLY interesting isn’t so much that Pitts is doing the infringing, but rather for WHOM Pitts is doing it.  More after the jump.

(more…)

The crowd wants information to be free

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

Let me begin with a picture of Kenneth Himma, Ph.D, J.D., and philosophy professor at Seattle Pacific University.

bacon

Alright, all kidding aside, this is actually actor Kevin Bacon in the 1978 film Animal House. And, if you are familiar with the scene being depicted, I should note that I am not asserting that Himma is a flustered ROTC student trying in vain to maintain order during a riot on the city streets after a fraternity prank causes mass chaos, uselessly shouting to the crowd “All is well!”. No, instead I should explain that this image is something that came to my mind when I realized that arguments Himma puts forth in a 2005 accepted and forthcoming APA Newsletters on Philosophy and Computers essay against the popular notion “information should be free” (ISBF) are likely to forever fall on deaf ears. (more…)

Embrace Infringement

Friday, June 12th, 2009

This is my final project for Kraig Baker’s Digital Media Law & Policy course at the University of Washington Master of Communication in Digital Media program, Spring Quarter 2009.

Should you stop suing your customers?

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

Lawrence Lessig and the Colbert Remix

Friday, January 30th, 2009

Yes, this is a little late in coming, but I wanted to blog about it for my friends and colleagues in the MCDM community anyways.  It seemed especially fitting to send this out to the gang because not only does the subject cover a multitude of issues we’ve discussed and continue to study relative to the Digital Media program, but it’s got Stephen Colbert, too.  And as far as I’m concerned, anything with Stephen Colbert is required viewing.

So, a couple of weeks ago Lawrence Lessig from Stanford appeared on The Colbert Report to discuss how copyright law is complicating things for everybody in the digital era, especially for kids, who are, unfortunately, being turned into criminals by institutions like the RIAA.  Here’s the interview:

Of course, near the end Colbert pretty much invites the world to take his material, even this interview, and “remix” it however they want.  Three cheers for encouraging the Colbert Nation to steal Viacom’s intellectual property!  And, of course, it was only a matter of time before the Interwebs would be all over this challenge.

(more…)


Bad Behavior has blocked 697 access attempts in the last 7 days.