<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From the telegraph to cyberspace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nerdacumen.com/reading-reflections-from-the-telegraph-to-cyberspace/2009/01/13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nerdacumen.com/reading-reflections-from-the-telegraph-to-cyberspace/2009/01/13/</link>
	<description>Interpreting the Nerd Universe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://nerdacumen.com/reading-reflections-from-the-telegraph-to-cyberspace/2009/01/13/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdacumen.com/?p=160#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Hi, Matt!

Essay feedback: shoot for a little less “this is what the author said” and more “these are my take-aways.” These are going to be graded on punctuation, spelling, grammar - and it looks like you kept that in mind. Structurally, the two paragraphs on the readings are each &quot;long&quot; and contain more than one idea. Think about pulling two nuggets from each (which would make two paragraphs) and then link each nugget to an opinion/take-away. 

Also, it&#039;s OK to focus on just one of the readings, if one has more meaning than the other.

Suppression? Think back to &quot;this browser best viewed with....&quot; Microsoft was seriously attempting to suppress. Just yesterday, I was on microsoft.com and couldn&#039;t download a file because it was a proprietary, MSIE-readable-only, alternative to Acrobat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Matt!</p>
<p>Essay feedback: shoot for a little less “this is what the author said” and more “these are my take-aways.” These are going to be graded on punctuation, spelling, grammar &#8211; and it looks like you kept that in mind. Structurally, the two paragraphs on the readings are each &#8220;long&#8221; and contain more than one idea. Think about pulling two nuggets from each (which would make two paragraphs) and then link each nugget to an opinion/take-away. </p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s OK to focus on just one of the readings, if one has more meaning than the other.</p>
<p>Suppression? Think back to &#8220;this browser best viewed with&#8230;.&#8221; Microsoft was seriously attempting to suppress. Just yesterday, I was on microsoft.com and couldn&#8217;t download a file because it was a proprietary, MSIE-readable-only, alternative to Acrobat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://nerdacumen.com/reading-reflections-from-the-telegraph-to-cyberspace/2009/01/13/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdacumen.com/?p=160#comment-55</guid>
		<description>That tension between keeping it open and free of regulation or  dealing with the crass and the ugly will be a defining issue for many users.  If users wait for the government to step in, I agree with Lessig that we will not be served well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That tension between keeping it open and free of regulation or  dealing with the crass and the ugly will be a defining issue for many users.  If users wait for the government to step in, I agree with Lessig that we will not be served well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

