Archive for the ‘old media’ Category

The two kinds of Web video

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

I believe that there are two kinds of Web videos – those that exist as self-contained narratives, and those that serve a functional external purpose.

Self-contained narratives are iterations of a larger type, what we have classically referred to as “movies” or “films”.  Movies can be anything from that 15 second clip of a dog on a skateboard to a two-hour long Netflix stream of Spider-Man 3.  To a degree such videos can serve a functional external purpose – for example, the skateboard video could be co-opted by a skateboarding website to help generate pageviews, and we certainly understand a large Hollywood movie like Spider-Man 3 is going to have all kinds of licensed merchandise tie-ins – but invariably, “movies” are, in the old media sense, individual SKUs meant to be consumed on a per-performance basis.  By individual SKU, I mean that we think of these movies as products, something we would have traditionally exhibited on the aforementioned per-performance basis; we’d sell tickets or rent the DVD or otherwise distribute, or commoditize, these self-contained narratives for no other reason than to create a viewing experience, or an individual performance of a narrative which, hopefully, would be paid for individually.  Moreover, the experience can end when the curtains close and the lights come up.

Now, the fortunate thing about the Web is that anyone, anywhere, even collaboratively over great distances, can produce movies, the 15-second or 2-hour variety, completely unrestricted, and post them almost anywhere on-line.  From there, movies can take on new life in the social media space, too, in that they can spread an idea, help build a filmmaker’s portfolio and reputation, foster a meme, and perhaps lead to further work for the filmmakers.  Also, movies can become an active part of participatory culture.

The unfortunate thing is that, as digital commodities with a reproduction price of zero, movies on-line are painfully difficult to sell as self-contained narratives.  Almost all must (or inevitably will via infringement) be shared for free.

Which brings me to our second variety of Web video, material that serves a functional external purpose… (more…)

Post-class Reflection: Economics 101, courtesy of Monday Night Football, Chris Anderson, and Mickey Mouse

Friday, October 30th, 2009

Epic MickeyI’ll explain what this image is about momentarily, but first, let me begin with a prologue.  Tuesday night in my Net Economics course at the UW MCDM a lively debate, to say the least, was had over Chris Anderson’s new book “Free”; whether free as a concept was good or bad.  I took the free side, but it made me feel a little lonely.  I almost felt like I was the only student in the room who believed that it’s a good thing that we’re moving towards a digital economy based on giving bits away, harnessing business models that find alternative sources of revenue.  For instance, a fellow student mentioned that Microsoft has a 90% market share of netbook operating systems, a testament to the strength of their software, no doubt.  However, I posited that if MSFT went the Anderson route and gave their OS away for free they could have a 100% market share.  I’m not going to say what the reaction to that was, but considering our proximity to Redmond and the makeup of the class, which includes Microsoft employees, you can take a wild guess…

Anderson’s “Free” starts out by giving us a quick economics briefing, using that as backdrop to defend the notion of ‘free’.  He explains that, for instance, traditional, or old media has used a third-party advertising model to earn revenue while still providing a “free” product.  I may not pay for 30 Rock, but when I buy products advertised during commercial breaks on TV or in interstitials on Hulu, I am still giving my money to NBC.  It’s pretty basic and has worked for Google, a benevolent empire that has largely amassed their wealth through selling advertising and diversifying revenue streams.  Of course, the model isn’t absolutely identical – the web magnifies things by presenting opportunities to apply wisdom gleaned from specific metrics and target users with relevant advertising, as well as ways of satisfying niches with long tail services – but the principle is the same: subsidize one product (free content) with money made from another (paid ad space).  Multiply and diversify.

With the notion of one product funding the other in mind, I further illustrate the point by explaining how I helped inadvertently save ABC, Monday Night Football, and the Disney company in 2004.  Maybe.  Or not.  But keep reading!  I think you’ll enjoy the reasoning anyways!

(more…)

Relax, it’s just a video until proven otherwise

Friday, August 14th, 2009

Is there a need to classify web video the way we classify TV content (e.g. shows, series, specials, dramas, comedies, etc.)?

No.*

Ok, let me elaborate a little.  Drew Keller put to us students in the MCDM’s Summer Web Storytelling class the same question, after being inspired by an article about the subject from Tod Sacerdoti at the Online Video Insider.  In his post, Sacerdoti explored the question: what is the most-watched show on the Internet?  What even defines a “show” online?  Drew also pointed us to an article in the New York Times discussing the growing popularity of longer-form videos on the web.  The TV business has after decades established standard terms for categorizing and classifying its content – serials, series, dramas, sitcoms, sports, primetime, latenight, and so on and so forth.  This serves many purposes, the most notable of which is to help measure viewership by timeslots and types of programs and sell advertising accordingly.  This doesn’t really work on the web, with a major exception (see asterisk below).

(more…)

Video Integration at Traditional Print Media Website: The Issaquah Press

Thursday, July 16th, 2009

About the Issaquah Press

I grew up on a little hill called Cougar Mountain, in the vicinity of Issaquah, Washington, where I also went to High School, did plenty of swimming in the community pool, and generally loitered away my youth.  I was first exposed to the Issaquah Press during my ambling about in this booming but still quaint Seattle bedroom community.  So, this local newspaper, a subsidiary of The Seattle Times and around for well over 100 years, has, like so many small pint papers, taken itself beyond its 16,000 plus circulation and on to the web (for more, see the About page at the Press).  Now, The Issaquah Press is by no means a major production, but, like many small town print outlets, the Press stands to gain from the death of old media through hyperlocalization, assuming it approaches the concept wisely (see: hyperlocal blogging).  By my estimation, this little newspaper is doing a lot of things right in its print edition.  This especially includes its video presence and integration.

(more…)

Responding to Heidi Sinclair on Media and Brand Supremacy

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

http://heidisinclair.wordpress.com/2009/04/24/brand-supremacy-and-media-the-new-brand-in-media-could-be-nike/

Heidi Sinclair argues that big brand names like Nike or Home Depot could be in an excellent position to enter the media business as content generators.  Nike could be the next ESPN, Home Depot could tackle the home improvement news realm, etc.  This is in keeping with Paul Gillin’s contention that a company like Staples could be a content source for information and resources related to small business, and so forth.

I completely, respectfully disagree with both Gillin and Sinclair.

(more…)

Two words for Walter Isaacson

Tuesday, February 10th, 2009

Walter Isaacson of the Aspen Institute appeared on The Daily Show Monday, February 9th, to discuss his recent cover article in Time Magazine about ways to save the dying newspaper industry. During his interview with Jon Stewart, he talks about how he’d like to see on-line versions of newspapers charge for articles in a manner similar to the way iTunes charges for songs. While I don’t condone piracy or copytheft of any kind, I do have two words for Mr. Isaacson: COPY, PASTE

Anyway, here’s the video:

Walter Isaacson on the Daily Show

Why do I feel like he’s dug up a dead horse? Barriers to entry for illegal filesharing are minimal at best these days; but circumventing news subscription services is an absolute piece of cake! I can’t think of a single time I have come across an article hiding behind a subscription service, usually mentioned in a forum at a news aggregator like Digg or Fark, where someone didn’t simply copy and paste the content to the forum or other venue for everyone else to see.

Stewart astutely posits the idea of news aggregators, like HuffPo or Drudge Report, giving portions of their ad revenue to sites that they link to, akin to a cable TV model. This seems a much more practical idea than returning to subscription models, but getting aggregators to play ball will be no easy feat. If major aggregators cave, others will crop up that don’t play, and the model will eventually fail.

Maybe journos should follow their broadcast journalism and cinema studies friends, ditch their keyboards, grab a camera and go find some news to shoot. As mentioned, video isn’t much for copypasta. And that’s the sort of thing the UW MCDM is preaching.

Inspiration: storytelling and the importance of old media

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

Though we exist in a time of great media upheaval, where the Internet has made available so much story for so little effort, millions are still drawn to long-form traditional narratives.  We still go to the cinema, the bookstore, the concert, the play, the big game, the event.  Though so much power can be packed into a media snack – a tweet, a blog post, a text message, a sentence, a word, or even an acronym (LMAO anyone?) – we still sit down for super-sized media meals.  Something must be inspiring us to pull up that chair and sup from the old media table.  Inspiration seems to be the answer.  What is the importance of inspiration to storytelling?  In our digital world – full of bombardment from massive narrative abstraction and fragmentation, where so much story content is being communicated in so many bits and bytes and packets like bullets from a fiber-optic Gatling gun – we still find time to stick the old media morphine drip in.  This happens when we do something so archaic as watch an hour-long drama on network television, spend nine innings at the baseball stadium, or, gasp, read an entire Harry Potter book cover-to-cover. (more…)


Bad Behavior has blocked 697 access attempts in the last 7 days.